October 20, 2004 A short Report on the KZN Parliamentary Health Portfolio Committee Sittings on Friday 15 October and The Constitution of South Africa says in section 118(1)(a)&(b): “A provincial legislature MUST facilitate public involvement in the legislative processes of the legislature and its committees; and conduct its business in an open manner…….” To the best of Doctors For Life (DFL’s) knowledge no notice of these hearings was given to the public by way of press advertisement or in any other manner. In a telephone call to one of DFL’s staff the Committee Chairman said ‘We would have expected an organisation like yours to know’. DFL did find out on Thursday 17 October ‘on the grapevine’ and sent representatives to the hearings on both the Friday and Monday. On Saturday 16 October their staff worked overtime hours to prepare and despatch by fax a 20 page submission both to the Secretary, and to the Chairman personally at her home. At neither hearing were the public given any opportunity whatever to make submissions, nor was DFL’s written submission referred to at all on the Monday during the debate. Only 2 MPs raised objections to the Bill, Margaret Ambler-Moore (DA) and Joanne Downes (ACDP). The Committee supported mandatory counselling (already in the existing Act but widely ignored) and voted to include a clause to hold abortion facilities liable for inadequate reporting; otherwise the ruling party overruled all objections. They asserted that nurses had adequate skills to perform abortions, and rejected obligatory scans to assess gestational age in spite of evidence that many abortions are performed illegally after 20 weeks. The Committee seemed obsessed with accessibility to abortion facilities and paid little or no regard to safety or the need to protect mothers from illegal abortions. The nation-wide pleas of doctors and nurses for a ‘freedom of conscience’ clause were dismissed. The chair and Dr BT Buthelezi (IFP) persuaded the Committee that this was unnecessary in the face of the DA’s insistence that health workers face tremendous pressure. The evidence that the DA are right is clear for all to see. The nurses union DENOSA has spoken out about it in the media and DFL is currently conducting a case in the The Committee appeared to be poorly informed; decisions were made on the basis of personal opinion and party allegiance rather than on evidence. Objections were dismissed on the basis that further hearings will be held in DFL looks forward to those hearings in
For more information, contact John Smyth QC, legal spokesperson (083 653 8804). Doctors For Life International represent more than 1300 medical doctors and specialists; three-quarters of whom practice in |
| You are viewing this
page from one of the Doctors For Life web sites. To return to the site you
were visiting, close this window. All Materials ©2004 Doctors For Life International unless otherwise noted. |